I can’t explain why it took me so long to see the final
Hobbit….
I was a huge fan of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy… I saw every single
one the first week movies in the theaters.
I spent hours watching extras and behind the scenes of the trilogy as
soon as they came out on DVD. I was
excited when the Hobbit was eventually announced---although I couldn’t imagine
how they were going to turn this small more kid friendly book into something as
epic as the Rings Trilogy. When they
announced it would be 3 movies…..I was kind of shocked. The Lord of the Rings trilogy was three
movies –but each movie covered one book and those books were much longer than
the Hobbit. Obviously the Hobbit movies
were going to have to have a lot of new stuff and filler to make this much
shorter book into a trilogy. Of course Peter Jackson was going to be
involved so that made me feel much better.
The first Hobbit although it had a different tone (set by the silly sequences of meeting the Dwarfs)…still
felt like Middle Earth.
It felt like the beginning of a journey –but had an interesting story and a satisfying conclusion. I also liked the second film
(Links of the my reviews to those films are below)
It felt like the beginning of a journey –but had an interesting story and a satisfying conclusion. I also liked the second film
(Links of the my reviews to those films are below)
It took me almost a year to get around to finally
watching the conclusion……So maybe that in itself shows that I liked the Rings trilogy better. I had to see Return of the King the weekend
it came out. I missed Battle of Five
Armies in the theaters…….Bought it the week it came out on DVD---but didn’t
watch it right away. The only explanation
I can give is that maybe I felt like the story was pretty much already done
after 2 films. This wasn’t a
conscious thought really….I didn’t think about it ---there was just no urgency.
Well now I know why……. And don’t get me wrong I still
enjoyed Battle of the Five Armies from a visual point of view----but story wise----There
really wasn’t anything left of the story to tell. The Battle of the Five Armies was literally
probably 2 chapters in the book……This battle was turned into an entire
movie.
So the story of the final film was basically just the
surviving Dwarfs have the mountain now and all the Armies go to war for
it. Of course the movie long battle was a visual
delight----but the lack of a story - just made it
feel like less of a film to me.
I just didn’t feel the same connection to it like I did with Lord of the Rings . I think the Hobbit would have been better served as 2 movies instead of 3. A lot could have been cut out of this trilogy and it probably would have been a better film. I know the Studios turned it into 3 movies for financial reasons---but I feel the final Hobbit films suffered as a result. The Battle of Five Armies was my least favorite of the 6 films. (Again I still enjoyed it) --but it wasn't as memorable as the previous films due to a lack of story.
I just didn’t feel the same connection to it like I did with Lord of the Rings . I think the Hobbit would have been better served as 2 movies instead of 3. A lot could have been cut out of this trilogy and it probably would have been a better film. I know the Studios turned it into 3 movies for financial reasons---but I feel the final Hobbit films suffered as a result. The Battle of Five Armies was my least favorite of the 6 films. (Again I still enjoyed it) --but it wasn't as memorable as the previous films due to a lack of story.
To see my thoughts on the previous films.
Here is An Unexpected Journey
http://bradgeekness.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-last-man-in-middle-eart-to-see.html
Desolution of Smaug
http://bradgeekness.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-hobbit-desolation-of-smaug-2013-9.html
Follow my movie facebook page here
http://www.superfantasticterrific.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment